![]() The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 92 litres). The Hyundai Kona may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The 2017 Captur facelift 2017 can hold 2.4 cu-ft (68 liters) more boot space than previous generation. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Kona, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 2 cm higher.Įven though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 16 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. Theres 265 litres of space with the seats up and the. Please note that this is only a technical comparison, based solely on techni. Sadly, due to its battery, the E-TECH can hold considerably less luggage than the roomier petrol version. intended to provide policy or guidance for VA’s enhanced-use leasing authority or use of space agreements pursuant to the expanded sharing authority. Renault Captur consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. Welcome to the video comparison between 2018 Renault Captur vs 2018 Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. Renault Captur engine produces 30 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Hyundai Kona. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |